Replies

The evidence of my stance is all over and yours simply does not exist.

Okay. I get it. Creationist "evidence" consists of lists of scientists, some from pre-Darwin days, who were/are creationists. Perhaps solid science like this is why ID failed so miserably in court.

very real scientists which you want to judge as not authentic for some reason.

If you give me the names of a million very real scientists who are creationists, and I could only supply one who accepted the fact of evolution, that doesn't change the fact that you've yet to provide anything in the way of evidence for creationism. Am I not making that point clear enough?

And now you are claiming that evolution is beyond the theory that it is but is a tenant of science.

Last post it was "tenent" and now it's "tenant." Psst, it's "tenet." So I guess I do agree that evolution is not a tenant of science. But it surely IS a tenet.

surley you are not a nazi!

No, I'm not a nazi. And don't call me Shirley. Or surly. Or a nazi. You're getting lazy with all this ridiculous name calling.

It honestly comes down to the rejection and anger of God which His creation is all about us.

Oh. Okay. Whatever dude. I'm a lying intellectual nazi who is angry with God. Right. On that note, FRiend, I wish you all the best in life and bid you and this absurd discussion goodbye. (Unless, of course, you figure out how to provide more than lists of 17th century astronomers who were creationists.)

You are being dishonest in our debate again my friend...the last link I provided had many scientist that are recent also ...not just pre darwin...not that that matters a whole lot.

Here is reference to some pretty amazing evidence of a creator in the dna code. Simply does not make sense that such a code , which is more complex than a computer code, could make itself!
http://www.creationism.org/heinze/SciEvidGodLife.htm