Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: arrogantsob

Madison opposed secession, but he also conceded it was an option of last resort to escape from intolerable oppression (though he said such an act, while perhaps justified, would constitute revolution).


379 posted on 08/06/2010 6:50:36 PM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]


To: ought-six
"Madison opposed secession, but he also conceded it was an option of last resort to escape from intolerable oppression (though he said such an act, while perhaps justified, would constitute revolution)."

And that is exactly my viewpoint. What the Southern states practiced was not secession, but revolution. There's a big difference. Revolution is illegal according to our laws or any country's laws. Secession of a state would be when both parties agreed to it through law, amendment process or some other political act.

That is why Paul's statements are idiocy, ignorance and most importantly dangerous. That is to blame 600,000 deaths on Lincoln as if the Southern states gave him some other option. They were performing an illegal act (rebellion) and initiated the shooting (Fort Sumter). Lincoln had every legal and moral right to put down the rebellion.

An example that all of us should think about. We have many muslims in the Dearborn region of Michighan. What if in the future the muslims there become such a large population that they have the political muscle to get a vote from the residents of the state of Michighan to secede from our country and start their own. Would the southern sympathizers be in favor of that? Something to consider. Do these same southern sympathizers think that the Basques in Spain should be able to break off? There are many ethnic enclaves in differing countries that would like to break off. We did not have a unique situation.
384 posted on 08/07/2010 5:38:28 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies ]

To: ought-six

Madison explicitly wrote Hamilton during that NY ratification convention and said that once in the Union always in the Union. He did not believe in a right to secede.

But since there was NO “intolerable” oppression, other than that visited upon slaves by the whips and chains of the slavers, so the RAT Rebellion was completely unjustified and would never have been supported by Madison. Southern states were in no way oppressed by the federal government.


512 posted on 08/11/2010 11:38:47 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson