Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Old Teufel Hunden
Tell me something. Did the people in the Southern states have a right to oppress people's liberties? Did the slaves in the Southern states have a God given natural right to rebel against their oppressors?

Slavery was legal, although immoral, it's legacy was part of our country racist past North and South. The manufacturing culture of the North didn't need the slave model so in the early 19th century they sold all their slaves "down the river" to the south. Then they (Northern mercantile class) raised tariffs on imports after making money on selling their slaves to the south. Then they turned against that "peculiar" institution on moral grounds making the hypocrisy factor unbelievable.

94 posted on 08/05/2010 7:42:06 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: central_va
"Slavery was legal, although immoral, it's legacy was part of our country racist past North and South."

So then because it was legal that made it okay to infringe on people's liberties? According to your logic then when the Federal government wanted to make a law that the new states and territories coming into the union not be slave states that was okay. After all, that was the reason the Southern states went into rebellion is because they wanted to extend slaves to the new territories. The law to abolish slavery in the South was not made until 1863 when the Southern states were already in rebellion.
101 posted on 08/05/2010 7:47:42 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

To: central_va
Slavery was legal, although immoral, it's legacy was part of our country racist past North and South.

FYI - thousands of blacks in this country were slave owners. Some were slave breeders, selling their own offspring into slavery.

Slavery was about money and selfishness, not racism.

140 posted on 08/05/2010 8:54:31 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

To: central_va

Not only was that mostly true (tariffs were national decisions which the South generally supported). But many of the fortunes of the earliest Northern industrialists came from the slave trade either directly or indirectly.

There were areas of NY state where slavery was as concentrated as in the South in the late 1700s. But that was an anomaly and most of the slaves in the North were dispersed in small numbers among the general population not held in large groups.

But for the invention of that Connecticut Yankee, Eli Whitney, slavery may well have been phased out in the South as is was in the North. It was an archaic institution unsuited to a modern economy.

However, much of the North was opposed to Lincoln taking the slavers on even after federal institutions were attacked. That part of the industrial class that depended upon cotton was vehemently opposed to the War. The cities controlled by the Democrats were opposed.


155 posted on 08/05/2010 9:15:27 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

To: central_va

BINGO!


571 posted on 08/13/2010 9:51:38 PM PDT by mojitojoe (When crisis becomes opportunity, crisis becomes the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson