Posted on 11/06/2010 8:33:39 PM PDT by Strk321
Did anyone get a load of Time's cover for this week? They have an ugly closeup shot of John Boehner where you can see the pores on his face. It looks similar to that infamous Newsweek cover of Sarah Palin. To top it off, all the letters to the editor they printed were ones that expressed displeasure with Tuesday's election results.
Seriously, do these guys even have a clue why their circulation is down to 92,000 copies a week? Probably not.
For real? That's hilarious.
The only way time magazine can sell their worthless magazines is by using people’s credit cards without their permission to buy subscriptions that they never wanted.
I am sure its not 92,000 lol. haha
Don’t worry. Not many people will ever see that.
I guess you should feel lucky they didn’t use one of his election night speech.
I stopped looking at that Rat rag years ago.
I’ll give a $1 to buy it and shut it down.
Here’s the TIME cover after the 1994 elections, which was much better. Love the eyes bulging out of the Donkey.
http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/images/item/time-1994.jpg
Presumably, conservative politicians know the leftist Democrat Party slant of Time magazine and other so called “news” magazines. Why pose for their photo covers? Everyone knows they will print the most unflattering photo they can take of a conservative politician in order to embarrass them in the public eye.
What happened between then and now ? This was a pretty big election for the GOP, maybe even bigger than 1994.
I would bet that half of those are for free or some kind of group-discount program also
Or free to air miles customers. A scam to inflate ad rates.
Worst was Gingrich with a green background. SLIME’s just typical LSM.
The Limbaugh Letter sells 500,000 monthly.
That’s got to be the least flattering photo I’ve seen of Boehner in my life. He’s a relatively photogenic guy, too. Honestly, this is worse than I’d predicted.
I will celevrate the dissing odf any progressive conservative.
I do not want Boehner as the speaker of the House.
I would much rather see a conservative like Marsha Blackburn, Jack Ryan or even Darryl Issa.
What a lame photo. At least make him look like Lex Luthor or something like that. :)
Well, the GOP took the Senate from Clinton and George Mitchell as well as the House, which had languished under Democrat control for 40 years at that point. Also, it was unexpected.
But this one is bigger for a lot of reasons: more house seats, a more radical House leadership deposed, a smaller road to hoe for the Senate in 2012 (red states like MT, MO, OH, ND), and a massive surge of governorships and state houses, just in time for the census redistricting.
That is so funny. The Limbaugh letter sells more than Time magazine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
