[Red Steel]

There is no “BUT” ... you are confusing a basic and simple term of art with the legal satisfaction and requirements for that term.

There is a 'BUT' alright. That you did not understand or ignored the word "jurisdiction" in Black's Law Dictionary ...you likely did not understand the word. No 'term of art' nonsense.

I enlighten you faither to the meaning of 'jurisdiction.' Here again,

"..."Jurisdiction" is not only "territorial jurisdiction" but it encompasses allegiance owing jurisdiction where the foreign citizen who owes allegiance to a foreign sovereign. A foreign citizen can pass on their foreign sovereign to their child born on a foreign land, therefore, the child is NOT a natural born citizen. "

Black's Law Dictionary definition is no different than Bouvier's Law Dictionary as seen below.

As we see, Bouvier's Law Dictionary informs us to the meaning of the word "jurisdiction" in their definition while Black's Law Dictionary does not.

[WOSG]

OK, you clearly don’t get it. Let’s try again ...

“There is no “BUT” ... you are confusing a basic and simple term of art with the legal satisfaction and requirements for that term.”

This STILL HOLDS. “Natural-born citizen” = “citizen from time of birth”

The 14th amendment defines birthright citizenship with the qualifier “under the jurisdiction”. I don’t have an argument over how that is defined. Go ahead and try to show a court ruling that agrees with your version of ‘jurisdiction’.

However that is defined, whether broadly or narrowly, you still have that same equivalence: “Natural-born citizen” = “citizen from time of birth”