“A silly deflection Obot since it was you who brought up Jay and Madison. Daniel Boone is highly likely not mentioned in any of briefs Obot, but he likely knew that it took citizen parents and born in the country to be a natural born citizen. And you are wrong [again and again] John Jay was cited in Apuzzo’s 20,000 word court brief. John Jay is the reason why the US Constitution has the Natural Born Citizenship clause. Before Jay’s letter reached the president of the Philadelphia Constitution convention, the Constitutional draft said “born” in the country to qualify to be president, and as we know now that changed to natural born. This should be a slam dunk proof to lying jus soli crowd, but they are delusional.”
Kerchner v Obama has not been heard by the Supreme Court therefore Apuzzo’s 20,000 word brief has not been read. We’ll all have to wait and see whether four of the Justices feel that there is any constitutional merit to the Kerchner petition.
“Wrong again, I used it correctly. You can think? LoL.
Land - “but a court’s placement of its imprimatur upon a claim that is so lacking in factual support that it is frivolous would undoubtedly disserve the public interest.”
Land did not give his approval or support for Taitz’s case; he evaded her charges made against the usurper in his “court.”
I’m glad to see that you looked up the word “imprimatur” and have attempted to clean up your vocabularly error. You are somewhat teachable.
Dismissing a lawsuit and sanctioning the plaintiff’s attorney to the tune of $20,000 is not “evading” her charges. It’s ruling that her charges are frivolous and without merit.
‘We see here again that Land was not “imprimatur” to Taitz’s case, and Thomas and Alito didn’t uphold anything they ‘Evaded’ the case just as Thomas testified to Cong Jose Serrano during a Cong hearing.”
Just because “evaded” is the favorite birtherbot term for every court ruling that goes against them doesn’t make it reality.
Actually, Rhodes didn’t write the letter someone else put words in her mouth and wrote it. We never heard from her again.
Show me where Captain Connie Rhodes has EVER stated that she didn’t write that letter to Judge Land. Captain Rhodes accepted the ruling of the court and she deployed to Iraq to fulfill her duty.
If Judge Clay D. Land was alone in ruling against the plaintiff in an Obama eligibility lawsuit, I’d grant you a debating point. But Judge Land is one of more than 120 judges, justices and appeals court panels, including the nine Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States that have ruled against every single Obama eligibility lawsuit that has been filed and adjudicated.
“This is one of several such suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution (see US CONST. Art. II, Section 1). This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”—Chief US District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth, US District Court for the District of Columbia in dismissing the quo warranto claim in Taitz v Obama, April 14, 2010.
Kerchner v Obama has not been heard by the Supreme Court therefore Apuzzo’s 20,000 word brief has not been read. We’ll all have to wait and see whether four of the Justices feel that there is any constitutional merit to the Kerchner petition. Yeah it may happen one day trollBot as that would be a day of dread for trolls, and you have no idea if Supreme Court justices have read Apuzzo's brief or not.
Just because “evaded” is the favorite birtherbot term for every court ruling that goes against them doesn’t make it reality.
That's exactly what they are doing when you see stupid and silly court opinions that state the Obama eligibility issue was "twittered" and "massaged" so we can "all" conclude Obama is constitutionally eligible to be president.