Even Pepsi got the message recently and produced a new "Throwback" Pepsi made with only cane sugar. It tastes great, better than their sucrose-laden drink, but it is hard to find in the stores. Costco sells Mexican-made Coca Cola that is also made with cane sugar. It's not as tasty as the Throwback Pepsi, but both are bad for your health.
Not a soda drinker myself — one eating vice I don’t have —but I recently purchased Sierra Mist for my husband because I had learned that it was made without HFCS. I can’t tell you yet how he likes it, as he has not tried it yet.
Even Pepsi got the message recently and produced a new "Throwback" Pepsi made with only cane sugar. It tastes great, better than their sucrose-laden drink, but it is hard to find in the stores. Costco sells Mexican-made Coca Cola that is also made with cane sugar. It's not as tasty as the Throwback Pepsi, but both are bad for your health.
Chemically, I think the major difference between corn syrup and cane sugar (sucrose) is that the former is a mixture of fructose and glucose in monosaccharide form, and the latter is fructose and glucose covalently bonded as disaccharides. Your body makes and breaks those bonds fairly readily, so there is no reason to think that, biologically speaking, the difference is significant. Also, I have no idea what you mean by "man-made", since all sugars are extracted from plants.
I don't drink sodas. The taste of them isn't that good, and trying to swallow a carbonated fizzy liquid feels like trying to swallow a suspension of tiny glass shards. Plus, the sugar in sodas and other drinks makes them so sweet and thick, they could almost be used as a pancake syrup. Why so many people like them is a complete mystery to me.