Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sinanju

I have never been able to get past the idea that the Lee-Enfield just looks plane ugly to me. I have got maybe one or two places left in the safe, so will probably pass. I realize this is not a rational decision.


45 posted on 12/13/2010 8:24:52 AM PST by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Retain Mike
I have got maybe one or two places left in the safe,

Boating accident?

46 posted on 12/13/2010 8:49:47 AM PST by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Retain Mike

Oh, I never for a moment disputed the fact that the Lee-Enfield does not have the graceful looks of the Mauser family. Even the “sporterized” Lee-Enfields of the early twentieth-century have an awkward quality. I just love those rugged, ergonomic qualities and that rock-steady, glass-smooth action.

And like I said earlier, the aperture sight of the final variant is one of the best darn iron sights on any rifle anywhere.


47 posted on 12/13/2010 9:18:43 AM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Retain Mike
I have never been able to get past the idea that the Lee-Enfield just looks plane ugly to me.

I used to think so too. But their real beauty is their functionality. For instance, name another bolt rifle whose headspace problems can be cured by screwing on a replacement bolt head. Not the Mauser or Springfield.

The slickest bolt action I ever found is the Krag. Slick as oiled ice.

53 posted on 12/13/2010 12:19:56 PM PST by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson