[ml/nj]

And where would I go? I believe that modern physics and modern chemistry are quite sound, but that evolution and much of geology are crocks. I'm not defending Genesis. I would just agree that Darwinian evolution is nonsense.

ML/NJ

[SoftwareEngineer]

I don't know. I guess you could go to FRMS and show us why evolution and geology are myths without relying on religion.

For example, a great case has been made that the Sphinx in Egypt is 10,000 years old. It defies conventional modern science by using hydrology to explain the type of wear and tear that they Sphinx has.

Modern Science is perpetually in upheaval. Things are constantly being proved AND disproved. But evidence relies on science to disprove science. New methods, new algorithms, new technologies.

CAVEAT: I am very religious person. But somehow, when it comes to science, I have relied more on the “modern” science method

[muawiyah]

Good point. Then there are the gang who believe the Bible is absolutely correct when it says God planted a garden in Eden ~ so he stopped by the Intergalactic Plant Shop on his way to Earth.

A simple dichotomy or bifurcation doesn't deal with the more reasonable explanations, Panspermia being one!

[gleeaikin]

Perhaps you have not read any really good modern books regarding evolution. I strongly recommend “Endless Forms Most Beautiful” by Sean Carroll (sp?). It is only a few years old and is quite a fascinating book.