Posted on 01/20/2011 7:47:50 PM PST by B4Ranch
Some folks, including some of very lofty status on FR,
seem to have an incapacity or unwillingness to face a lot of facts
. . . not to mention a lot of probable facts.
By the time there’s obviously and overtly no longer ANY doubt on such things, they will likely be on various lists for termination and near to the deed.
What is it about folks addiction to thinking that a TYPE II ERROR is more benign than a TYPE I ERROR when both can be as deadly as the other!
Wishful thinking and fears . . . as well as terminal insecurities about facing unprecedented change and looming hoors may have a part.
My retired Boeing Navy friend insists those are merely weights for testing aircraft etc. etc. etc.
What do I know.
It’s OK, they’re obviously just spraying beer.
They don't. How long does a cloud last?
My hunch is they are simply trying to protect themselves, their wife or children who are involved in the program and for that I cannot abuse them. More than likely, I would do the same.
Conceivable.
However, he’s no longer married for 30 years . . . 2 sons grown and pretty well able to take care of themselves.
He did allow that such kegs could be used to spray. He just insisted that the ones in those pics were obviously for weight use in testing aircraft.
I don’t know.
I certainly believe chemtrails is evil.
If you sign agreement not to talk about a subject then you aren’t going to screw up your pension by talking, are you?
I’d think it would have to be a very very rare occasion and when there was nothing else to lose.
However, from what I know of this guy, he simply didn’t believe the picture related to chemtrails.
He’s well aware of the NWO and is not technically averse to the idea of chemtrails. He came across as simply not believing that particular picture of that particular plane was involved in chemtrails.
He’s also extremely obsessively precise, accurate, thorough in his analysis and investigations of anything whatsoever. I don’t know anyone as obsessive as he is about researching a topic. If he asserts anything as factual at all, it’s because he’s researched it super exhaustively.
In this case, he was just voicing his personal opinion from his work experience. I doubt seriously that his work experience had much of anything to do, even tangentially with chemtrails.
IIRC, he did allow that theoretically, a chemtrails plan might look similar on the inside. He just didn’t believe that was a pic of one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.