[sargon]

I ask you for a poll-—any poll-—showing Palin anywhere close to Obama, which you can’t or won’t produce . . . and I’m spinning off the charts.

Funny. When you responded to me earlier, you said "but more recently---which is the point of this thread---she has lost support with the so-called independents."

So you are saying that I should only cite a poll within a narrow time frame? I thought you said "any poll". I told you such polls exists, and they do. So I noted that, and then you moved the target.

[LS]

No, I didn't move. In case you forgot the article in the thread itself cited polling data saying she had lost indies. And your 10% poll? Seriously? So, if someone is behind 10, you can claim bad methodology and have them ahead? I suppose that works in some really, really bad polls . . . and this was what you came up with? We won't get anywhere.

But tell you what: when you get a real poll, by Ras, Mason-Dixon, Gallup, WSJ, Zogby, even an average on RCP, showing Palin up, please ping me.