While the article touched the subject of CO2 enhanced oil recovery, it falls short of running the math and producing the graphs of its impact. Changing the typical recovery from 10~30% to 40% using CO2 and existing technology is strictly a function of cost. It can supply immense quantities of oil from known sources that already have most of the production equipment in place.
But typical of TOD, including such information would not match their doom-n-gloom prediction from obviously well informed source.
They don’t actually lie, but they deceive by leaving essential information out.
Yep which the oil companies and these yahoos know about CO2.
Leaving out essential info is lying.