Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mikelets456
Either ND or WY.

Medical care is adequate; they're underpopulated; they're close to Canada, and I can handle the winters.

I'd have said MN or WI too....but MN is socialist and WI just turned conservative, but may not stay that way.

Both ND and WY are so small (people wise) that I don't care what the state political leaning is.

206 posted on 01/31/2011 9:38:41 AM PST by Logic n' Reason ("Don't start coloring until you know where the lines go.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Logic n' Reason

Re: North Dakota & Wyoming

North Dakota is “moderate” conservative at the state political level and quite to very conservative once you get away from the public sector in Bismarck, Grand Forks and Fargo.

Wyoming is more conservative at the state level (their outgoing Dem governor was more conservative than N.D.’s outgoing Republican governor, who is now the new senator) and Wyoming is marvelously conservative out in the countryside-—if you stay away from Jackson Hole and country club spots like that.

North Dakota is colder and doesn’t have mountains, but it has good bird hunting and great walleye fishing in the 200-mile long Lake Sakakawea; Wyoming has good rivers and trout fishing and big-game hunting, but once you are away from the mountains you could just as well be in North Dakota.

Both states have oil; North Dakota positively swims in the stuff right now. You want work, you want to make money and you are a tough bastard who can take cold, heat and real work-—head to western North Dakota. Write your own ticket.


225 posted on 01/31/2011 11:22:33 AM PST by dblup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson