Natural law has been apparent to people in a conscious sense ever since the first male offered a bunch of bananas to a willing female.
You did not.
Your argument is invalid and your response incoherent in the context of the discussion.
You have not, and your post does not, answer the question:
Why is natural law on the side of Wal-Mart and not on the other side?
That question was prompted by the following statement from your post 335: "Natural law is also on the side of Wal-Mart."