Not to say I don’t have a couple of ideas though.
I’d look at Indonesia rather than Kenya.
I’d look at the 14th Amendment and International law rather than Article II eligibility.
I’d think about the whole thing being misdirection.
I’d do that because we’re being directed to look at Kenya and Article II.
Why an admission against interest?
Why are we always made to look at Barack Obama, Sr, and not Lolo Soetoro?
I think you have some particular motive at play other than as stated.
I think Ayers’ book is mostly fiction little bits of fact tossed in. I think that the Kenyan Obama’s marriage to Stanley Ann, whatever it may have been, was for convenience for each of them, and other than the papers - whatever way they might have arranged it - they had no relationship at all.
Good points.
Things before 1964 are a mess. But the March 1964 divorce would have caused the records to be cleaned up. Officially, the records in Hawaii reflect the same information in the certificates. Whether they are real or not. And likely not.
Indonesia is the gateway to the real issues. Indonesia terrified the Obama team in late 2006 and 2007.
Passport break-ins, bad social security numbers, relationships with WUO members who were experts at identity fraud, 999-99-xxxx SS numbers used by foreign national students in colleges.
Lolo, Indonesia and Oxy. Something is there - and it is still hidden. And it is damning.