Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colt on the Outs as Defense Department Opens Bids for Combat Rifles
Fox News ^ | May 25, 2011

Posted on 05/26/2011 6:45:31 AM PDT by KeyLargo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: DTogo
One of the requirements of the rifle is an effective range of 400meters. That would require something better than a .223 and a 6.5 Grendel would be my choice. It requires a barrel/bolt change, but otherise uses all the same parts. Mags can be adapted.

It's the cheapest choice by far. Unless a gun company unveils some new technology, which is possible, there really isn't a better choice than modernizing the m4. (how about starting with 18" barrel along with the caliber upgrade.)

41 posted on 05/26/2011 7:56:30 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Durus
How do you figure they are better?

I don't. I merely say that the two rifles I noted will likely be in the competition. The Army (hopefully with input from the troops) will decide the definition of "better".

42 posted on 05/26/2011 8:01:33 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: null and void
What we need to do is inflict horrible disfiguring painful and disabling wounds with a slow lingering burdensome death.

I like the way you think. I can't recall which ancient war it happened during, but there was a King who once he defeated his enemies blinded 9 out of ten of the prisoners and took one eye out of the remaining so he could lead the rest home. This put such a burden on the defeated society that they couldn't raise another army.

43 posted on 05/26/2011 8:04:15 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Have we even officially declared a war since those days?

Regardless of what they are called, though, it seems like the troops have done plenty well with the equipment provided to them in the first Gulf War, Iraq, Panama, Grenada, Afghanistan, etc...

Americans are WINNERS, and I’d put all of those in the WIN column. :)


44 posted on 05/26/2011 8:07:37 AM PDT by Fletcher J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
It's neither. What causes most of the problems in America? It's the same thing that caused the initial problems with the M16 that gave it a bad rep. Yes, ignorant government bureaucrats making stupid decision. First they decided to change the ammo to a powder type which the M16 team strongly objected too. Second they shipped the rifles without cleaning kits. It was a bit of a one-two punch and the M16 has never lived down the reputation caused by moronic hacks.

If you attach a reciprocating mass to a barrel you create inaccuracy. If that reciprocating mass has lots of moving parts you introduce complexity. With an AR you have a tube. There isn't much to go wrong with a tube. Chrome&Coat the bolt and that rifle will be as reliable as any named as competition.

45 posted on 05/26/2011 8:09:18 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: randomhero97
Yeah, I have heard that as well. Apparently, from what I read, the Army is implementing two squad riflemen now with M-14s.

The solution, rather than trying for "one-size-fits-all" might be to have a 5.56 and 7.62 that are ergonomically similar (to simplify training), and issue the better marksmen in the squad the 7.62 (having a rifle that can hit at 800 yards is no good unless you have a rifleman that can use that potential).

46 posted on 05/26/2011 8:10:23 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Durus

You just conceded my point.

It needs.constant.cleaning, even with the proper amunition. Cleaning you may not have time for or.which may be unadvantagouse in the typhoon or sandstorm you are in.

I prefer a weapon that is reliable when I am in a khamsin or slogging through a Phillipino swamp in monsoon season. Both of which are places I wound up.

Gas operated aint it.


47 posted on 05/26/2011 8:42:33 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

“Because the platform is high maintenance, and short on weapon life”

What???

The platform is probably the easiest to maintain weapon ever. And that includes over/under shotguns or pumps.

If anything does go wrong you just replace the part. In about 30 seconds. You may shoot out a barrel in about 35,000 rounds or so. Replace the barrel. Or, just replace the whole upper. Takes about 30 seconds. Damn...


48 posted on 05/26/2011 9:06:10 AM PDT by saleman (!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

I like the HK 416.

I’d like to have one chambered in .243


49 posted on 05/26/2011 9:31:25 AM PDT by WayneS ("I hope you know this will go down on your PERMANENT record...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
No I didn't concede your point. An AR doesn't need "constant" cleaning. Does it need to be cleaned more than a piston? Yes. Even a piston platform needs to be cleaned. There is no such thing as a perfect rifle and all platforms have strengths and weakness. A rifle has to do more than go BANG every time you pull the trigger. It has to be capable of the accuracy required to hit what you are aiming at. The biggest weakness of a piston platform is accuracy. The biggest weakness to the m4 is the caliber. The second biggest weakness is also one of it greatest strengths. Because it's a gas impingement system, powder residue is deposited in the chamber, but because it is a GI system it is also more accurate than a piston. Chrome plating the bolt mitigates the weakness while preserving the strength. Putting something other than 5.56 in the stoner platform removes its biggest weakness.
50 posted on 05/26/2011 9:40:41 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Durus
Doubt if we can ever come up with a one size fits all weapon. Russia faced similar problem with the AK-47 vs. the AK-74. Dr. Kalashnikov did not want the caliber of "his AK" changed in any way. But of course he takes orders like all do. The AK-74 was designed to increase the range of lethality for the Russian soldier. It did so in 'Stan and became known as "the poison bullet" by the Muj.

However, in the Battle of Grozny 1 and later 2, the Russians noted penetration problems with the smaller round in a urban setting. Ultimately Grozny became known as the "most destroyed city in the world." This as a result of fuel-air bombs and arty. Most Russian units went back to the Ak-47.

I agree transitioning from one platform to another (especially in the middle of a war) is probably not the best thing to do.

51 posted on 05/26/2011 9:56:32 AM PDT by donozark (It's hard to afford a psychiatrist when you would at a gas station...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Durus

Why replace the platform?

Same question for the M-14, way back when. I’m sure the Garand boys wondered why the M14 wasn’t just sleeved down to a smaller caliber.


52 posted on 05/26/2011 9:56:55 AM PDT by flowerplough (Obama: "Get back inside '67 borders." / Helen Thomas:"Go back to Poland and Germany!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

In my mind, the only battle rifle is the Garand.


53 posted on 05/26/2011 9:58:02 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Durus
Even a piston platform needs to be cleaned.

True, but the piston's location isn't usually in the chamber area as is the gas port on the AR platform. In the Garand it is far forward near the muzzle and in the M-1 Carbine it is below and forward of the chamber, isolated. Allowing gas exhaust and particles in the chamber area (behind the throat) to me is a bad idea.....

54 posted on 05/26/2011 10:06:58 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

No the piston is bolted to the barrel which is what makes a piston rifle innacurate. Do you have a piston rifle? Have you ever broken an oprod?


55 posted on 05/26/2011 10:12:21 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough

Because they wanted a lighter, more dependable, more accurate rifle?


56 posted on 05/26/2011 10:13:39 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
There is only one serious choice for a new battle rifle:

Mosin Nagant.

;-)

57 posted on 05/26/2011 10:19:07 AM PDT by SIDENET ("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donozark
"Dr. Kalashnikov did not want the caliber of "his AK" changed in any way".

Only a commie could steal the Sturmgewehr 44 design, make it even uglier, and still get famous as a gun inventor.

58 posted on 05/26/2011 10:22:33 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Durus

But it sure became popular, and still killing...after all these years.


59 posted on 05/26/2011 10:28:20 AM PDT by donozark (It's hard to afford a psychiatrist when you would at a gas station...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Durus

“Because they wanted a lighter, more dependable, more accurate rifle?”

And would somewhat similar desires come into play now? Perhaps a low-maintenance, dependable, more-versatile rifle is where the DoD’s trying to go, this time?


60 posted on 05/26/2011 10:30:02 AM PDT by flowerplough (Obama: "Get back inside '67 borders." / Helen Thomas:"Go back to Poland and Germany!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson