Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GUILTY: Ersland found guilty in pharmacy shooting trial
KFOR-TV ^ | May 26, 2011

Posted on 05/26/2011 3:05:28 PM PDT by FourPeas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-185 last
To: vetvetdoug

Whether or not he kept his mouth shot would not have changed anything. There was a videotape showing him commit murder. Hard to argue against that.


181 posted on 05/27/2011 4:43:42 PM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rednek

One has the same right as one has always had in Oklahoma and the law is pretty firm on self-defense in Oklahoma. What is not supported in Oklahoma is cold-blooded murder.

Once you get a guy down and out, having shot him ... what you don’t do in Oklahoma, once your first gun is out of bullets, is walk over somewhere else, get another gun, then walk back to the guy on the ground and proceed to shoot five more bullets into him from the second gun you just got. It’s that second part that is not allowed in Oklahoma ... :-)


182 posted on 05/28/2011 9:16:54 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Ummm... the conviction of a cold-blooded murderer ...

If the pharmacist had stopped when the guy was shot and down and out, the pharmacist would have been okay.

But, walking back into the shop, going and getting a second gun (when the first one was out of bullets) and then walking back over to the guy (still on the ground) and then shooting him with five more bullets ... well ... it was that part that got him the murder conviction.


183 posted on 05/28/2011 9:20:01 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

In Oklahoma, when you get a concealed weapon permit (which is a good idea and it’s pretty much automatic), you have to go in for some training about what is allowed and not allowed. They’ll train you that this kind of thing (that the pharmacist did) is not allowed legally, and that you will be legally responsible for murder if you do it.

Obviously this guy must not have gone through this kind of training, I would say.

So, the overwhelming majority of us in Oklahoma do know the difference between self-defense and murder and we simply wouldn’t do what that pharmicist did - while we WOULD defend ourselves, without a doubt, just as the D.A. said was perfectly fine (in what the pharmacist did - if he had stopped at that point).


184 posted on 05/28/2011 9:29:13 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

If he did go through the training; he was either absent that day or he wasn’t listening.


185 posted on 05/28/2011 10:11:48 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-185 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson