“Once the robbers made a decision to rob, then that is the path you chose. Someone pulls a gun usually means business.”
Cops fire multiple rounds into people, who move the wrong way.
People ask: “Why did they kill him? Coulda just wounded him.”
But the PDs reply they are trained to fire to kill, period. And that scenario usually prevails.
But now this civilian is different. He doesn’t get to keep shooting until the threat is stopped, dead.
It is a double standard.
For any of those that think this guy should get FIRST DEGREE MURDER... I'll ask this. Why aren't the cops in Arizona being charged with murder of a Marine whose house was assaulted by mistake, shot 60 times, and allowed to bleed out while they made up a scenario that he shot at them (found his gun on safety),...
The cops can now break into your house, murder you and you best not defend yourself or you'll die and/or get charged with murder.
As another angle to this where I grew up in San Antonio, if somebody was a witness to a felony by a gang banger, you better move cause you're DEAD if you try to testify or give eyewitness evidence to the police.
NO SNITCHES... that's why the little punk should have been killed and the runner should have met the same fate. Just because he was not a threat at the time, if this pharmacist had tried to testify against him or the runner, I'd bet he would have been threatened or worse.
A little maggot got killed, too bad.
I don't have to like the pharmacist but I can't say I wouldn't have done the same thing.... all except for the talking to the cops.
He should have done what the Home Depot did when the cops murdered that Navy guy in Vegas.... "lose the video". Gee , isnt' it funny how stuff like that happens when cops are pulling the trigger, but this clown actually kills a robber and is now facing prison, loss of his career and his life is now screwed. I feel sorry for the pharmacist.