1 posted on
05/30/2011 5:45:02 PM PDT by
decimon
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
05/30/2011 5:45:52 PM PDT by
decimon
To: decimon
suggesting it mated with a completely different and much larger species. Larger? And, sure, species interbreed all the time. (E.g. Muslims and goats) What was this guy smoking?
ML/NJ
3 posted on
05/30/2011 5:49:34 PM PDT by
ml/nj
To: decimon
To: decimon
Giamo Casanunda, please call the office!
5 posted on
05/30/2011 5:57:33 PM PDT by
Grut
To: decimon
What’s that great line from Ice Age II, Meltdown? “You aint go’in to save the species tonight or any night.”
6 posted on
05/30/2011 6:03:30 PM PDT by
WellyP
To: decimon
Feh, I’m just glad they’re gone. We would have to go back to 4-bore rifles
7 posted on
05/30/2011 6:06:36 PM PDT by
nerdwithagun
(I'd rather go gun to gun then knife to knife.)
To: decimon
Questions are popping up about how they did it ~ so undoubtedly SOMEBODY had to stand on a tree trunk!
8 posted on
05/30/2011 6:11:50 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: decimon
They were both Mammoths so they were not different species, they were variations of the same species.
9 posted on
05/30/2011 6:13:31 PM PDT by
calex59
To: decimon
The woollies weren't picky, happy to interbreed
I can relate.
10 posted on
05/30/2011 6:13:31 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: decimon
it mated with a completely different and much larger species. The big question for Evolution is how does one species give rise to another species. And central to that is "what is a species?" A poodle can breed with a labrador -- no big deal, they are the same species. A poodle with a persian cat? Much more challenging.
But evolutionists like to change their thinking based on what is convenient. A mammoth breeding with a completely different species? [shrug] Sure. Why not? [/s]
12 posted on
05/30/2011 6:19:47 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
To: decimon
I don’t the smaller mammoths had much choice in the matter as to whether they wanted to interbreed with the bigger ones.
13 posted on
05/30/2011 6:25:31 PM PDT by
Jonty30
To: decimon
Matty told Hatty about a thing she saw. Had two big horns and a wooly jaw. Wooly bully, wooly bully.
To: decimon
The Woolies weren’t Picky, happy to interbreed.
So was Obama’s Mama.
17 posted on
05/30/2011 6:31:39 PM PDT by
Venturer
To: decimon
Goodness. This is one "ivory-tower" (so to speak) theory they might actually be able to test, in a sort of "Pleistocene Park" scenario:
Extinct Woolly Mammoth May Be Resurrected by Scientists
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/woolly-mammoth-resurrected-scientists/story?id=12646477
To: decimon
“Listen to them. Children of the night. What music they make.”
But seriously
if they bred with this other species, and had issue, wouldn’t that mean they were actually both varieties of the same species?
30 posted on
05/31/2011 3:58:14 AM PDT by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: decimon
Pictures and range for comparisions...
To: decimon
32 posted on
05/31/2011 4:13:22 AM PDT by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet)
To: decimon
A always knew the Woolly Mammoth was easy.
Buy them a couple drinks and they'd do anything.
33 posted on
05/31/2011 5:15:56 AM PDT by
Condor51
(The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits [A.Einstein])
To: decimon
...it was likely that woollies moved to more pleasant conditions of the south, where they came into contact with the Columbians (Colombians) at some point in their evolutionary history
Which means Panama was up and running. This means there are remnants of woollies here in Panama.
The last woollie recorded here was John McCain.
To: decimon
... it was likely . . likely derived . . . We think we may be looking at a genetic hybrid, . . it's not unlikely that . . .Ya, that's science.
35 posted on
05/31/2011 7:21:08 AM PDT by
aimhigh
(True bitter clingers cling to their guns AND their bibles.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson