Actually Diana was bulimic, was a narcissist, so it’s not like she’s not telling the truth. Diana was also someone who lied on a frequent basis and ended up nearly destroying her husband’s family. Diana was no stranger to the royal game (having grown up around the Queen and actually referring ot her as “Aunt Lilibet”) so Diana knew the drill and I am sure that if Charles had not had a title, she would have never looked twice at him.
>>Actually Diana was bulimic...<<
So now illness is a character flaw, and something to attack her for, after her death? Interesting.
Sorry, there is such a thing as decency, and Ann showed none.
Di was “anorexic” and “bulemic” and that is a fair line of attack?
Reagan had Alzheimer’s, and the left used that as an attack.
Somewhere, class and dignity has to enter the picture.
I believe it was the other way around. They destroyed her.
Charles dated Diana when she was 19, and he was 32. He wasn't in love with her, but he apparently married her to get an heir to the throne.
Camilla Parker-Bowles was the third party in that marriage, and Prince Charles' obsession with her eventually helped to bring about an end to the marriage.
Diana was not prepared to cope with the unhappines of her marriage, and she did not survive.
Anne, on the other hand, a woman around the age of 50, has never committed herself to marriage and motherhood.
Instead she's dated a few liberals and for whatever reason, finds it necessary to attack a troubled woman who died young.
In other 10 years, Anne will be 60, and her attacks on people like Diana will make her seem like an aging crank.