The one thing I question is there was no DNA on the tape? Then the persecutor says “someone at this house killed Caylee” what an idiot.
“The one thing I question is there was no DNA on the tape?”
Which means what? NO ONE placed the tape on Caylee’s head? No one with DNA placed the tape? Or the tape placed itself? Wake up—the tape itself is evidence of murder. There’s no other reasonable purpose for it. Who had access to all the pieces (means) of this, yes, OBVIOUS murder? “[S]omeone at this house . . .”! Who had the opportunity to tape the child’s face, bag her, and transport her to what wasn’t her final resting place? “[S]omeone at this house . . .”! Who had the motive to eliminate this child? “[S]omeone at this house . . .”! And that house’s “someone” is easily narrowed to the child’s mother, whose chosen lifestyle was clearly impaired by the continuing existence of undesired “baggage.” The same “someone” who could not be allowed by her defenders to take the stand in her own defense.