Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo
The mobility of Ni atoms/nuclei (condition (1)) is enhanced by the use of an electric resistance heater to maintain higher temperatures.

This part bothers me. If energy is being generated, then a heater should only be needed in the beginning, with temperature thereafter being maintained by the reaction, and kept in the desired range by controlling the flow of coolant.

I had been thinking the continued electricity was needed to maintain some sort of electric field condition.

11 posted on 07/09/2011 10:26:23 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (In the land of the pigs, the butcher is king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625
"This part bothers me. If energy is being generated, then a heater should only be needed in the beginning, with temperature thereafter being maintained by the reaction, and kept in the desired range by controlling the flow of coolant."

I think this is mostly an artifact of the relative crudity of the current reactors, and due to the low cost and simplicity of doing small-scale feedback control of electricity (heat), vs small-scale control of flow-rate. Temp controllers and RTD's are a lot cheaper and faster acting than precise flowmeters and control valves. Once you get into "industrial scale" situations, those criteria shift a bit.

"I had been thinking the continued electricity was needed to maintain some sort of electric field condition."

There are hints in some of theories and experimental work that such an effect "does" happen. But Rossi has said several times that he can run his reactors without the electricity...just that they are less stable/controllable.

And it might be possible that such an effect can be used in an E-Cat to either improve control, or boost output.

14 posted on 07/09/2011 10:44:01 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
I had been thinking the continued electricity was needed to maintain some sort of electric field condition.

As I read the article, the heater was needed to bring the material above the Curie temperature, destroying ferromagnetism, and allowing a couplet to be formed with no net magnetic spin.

21 posted on 07/09/2011 12:10:23 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney (New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. A primer on armed revolt. Available form Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
According to what (I think) I read, the external heat helps initiate the desired reaction then further enhances the process. Strictly speaking, the heat is not necessary for continued reaction. Nevertheless, the amount of heat generated by the reaction exceeds the power used by the external heater. The coolant is water that is heated past boiling to produce steam.

Rossi has, in essence, said that the units thus far developed are rudimentary and will likely be improved as time and experimentation goes on.

24 posted on 07/09/2011 9:05:16 PM PDT by oneolcop (Lead, Follow or Get the Hell Out of the Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

It could be that the LENR reaction is still so sporadic that it cannot be counted on reliably to produce the heat.


25 posted on 07/09/2011 9:38:48 PM PDT by Kevmo (Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson