It was A transitional form between dinosaurs and birds - a feathered flying dinosaur.
It may not have been THE transitional form that eventually evolved into birds, but rather an offshoot that went extinct.
So how does a feathered flying dinosaur disprove evolution through natural selection of genetic variation again?
It doesn’t.
It is the same “look science changes what it believes based upon evidence, while we still believe the same thing despite all evidence.” creationist canard.
What evidence is there of any connection between birds and dinosaurs at all?
When did this crossover occur?
We simply do not know, and there is zero proof of the connection between birds and dinosaurs.
Scientific theories need to be based on empiricism, not one fanciful wishful thinking like Kiplings, “how the rino got his horns”.
Hey Allmendream......
Long time since you’ve laid an ad hominem on me.
There are many issues with the whole dinosaur/bird thing.... here’s a big problem that evolutionists never address:
There are real bird fossils that have been found in much older strata than Archaeopteryx. How could he have been transitional between dinos and birds if birds already existed? Simple question that deserves an explanation.... perhaps you have one Allmendream?
No, the question is how does it prove it.
So how does a feathered flying dinosaur disprove evolution through natural selection of genetic variation again?