It's still gibberish even when a "smart" person says it.
It’s still gibberish even when a “smart” person says it.
The law of spontaneous generation was disproved by Louis Pasteur through his vaccine breakthrough research. They almost threw him in prison for “speaking” heresy against science.
If we had kept with it we would have never thought that pathogens actualy pass from one person to the other, that parasitic possession is real and transmitable, thus mandating life saving measures of quarantining.
The same goes for the spirit or listening to liberal drivel or being amongst sinners.
The salient point is not whether Hawkins is right or not, but where did his mindset on the stuff come from? How was his science derived from this? I can hardly believe science is the genesis of the conclusions he comes with.
There is such a thing as theoretical physics and ideological theory, and often great errors and blindness are perpetrated in projecting shadows and reading datas to fit one’s theory and one’s depression to transmit to others.
I posit that if the universe was not created, then we are created by a nothing, a nil, but somehow the same nil is kind enough to have given Hawkins a wheelchair and let him, his intellect and his spirit expound, out of cursory curiosity and respect. Is it by chance that he was given an audience? Is he the special result above others? Or is specialness derived from one’s humbler and thus deeper vision of things. This is where this is getting at in terms of narcissism.
So the chicken that didn't exist yet laid the egg it was hatched from ... right?
Hey Steve ... gfy, asshole.
That is the very definition of a miracle, isn't it?
Whew.. Talk about an overrated, politically correct media darling.