Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: QBFimi

The Patent and Trademark office doesn’t do much research looking for prior art before issuing patents. Several years ago they gave Roger Billings a patent on networking. IBM and Xerox had been networking for years before that but PTO ignored that little fact. The courts finally invalidated the patent. Google is likely talking about such patents, and they can probably show prior art when required.


6 posted on 08/05/2011 11:10:59 PM PDT by webboy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: webboy45
Google is likely talking about such patents, and they can probably show prior art when required.

I think what they are going to find is that the "prior art" had been created and patented by Novell & Nortel and was known to have been patented when Google started using it and that MSFT et al legally acquired the rights to it.

In fact, it appears MSFT asked Google to join them in making the purchase

9 posted on 08/06/2011 5:42:54 AM PDT by Tribune7 (We're flat broke, but he thinks these solar shingles and really fast trains will magically save us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson