Posted on 08/09/2011 6:10:13 PM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/09/2011 6:11:45 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Why is there a Google +1 link if the screenshot was made “When Snopes.com posted Polland’s fake document”?
I mean, what background could James Madison, the principal author of the Constitution, have for really understanding what the phrase "natural born citizen" means?
What's his credentials and claim for knowledge to try to usurp what thousands of birthers and Corsi and WND readers all KNOW as fact?
/sarc
Good point! How could I think James Madison understood the Constitution! /sarc
“
How about an unwed mothers home, born over the border in Canada from their Washington State home. It explains her arriving at her previously registered college with an infant she barely knew how to care for.”
Exactly, and it ties in with what the sperm donor (big barack) said, that his knocked up underage babymama was going to give the child up for adoption through the salvation army. There were two unwed mothers’ homes in Vancouver that were frequented by Seattle girls in trouble. One was run by the catholic church, which her liberal atheist family would not have chosen, and the other was run by the salvation army.
She probably originally intended to give up baby Barack for adoption, but at the last minute decided to keep her baby. Thus she shows up back in Seattle with a baby she did not know how to take care of.
There was even a memorable Freeper thread where Birthers beat him bloody when he got caught in some other lies.
***I haven’t been keeping up with that aspect of Certifigate. Do you have a link to this thread?
>>Where are all the “Constitutionalists?” <<
These days we’re known as “birthers”.
Polarik is an A#1 ass. The guy declared an authentic Hawaiian COLB a forgery.
Sheesh..is Polarik your life partner? You seem unusually defensive about a guy who is a genuine jerk.
sheesh, are you a tea bagger?
I made it this far. I was on that original thread with Danae, where it was memorable that she needed to be told that posting to ‘all’ was not posting to All. I would have declared Danae’s authentic COLB a forgery, too, because it contained information only available after 2007 that she claimed she had in 2000.
The fact you’re using that as the main leverage to show that Polarik is what you say, shows you to be simply a con man, as your login suggests.
To: Polarik
It’s moments like this that make me wonder why we bother - I also suffered through that stupid episode, during which the poster insisted and insisted and insisted...that the date-stamped 2007 CoLB she presented, was ISSUED in 2000.
When finally, after tempers frayed as the result of the only possible conclusion...that what she had shown could only be a forgery...IF WHAT SHE INSISTED WAS CORRECT...
SHE WROTE AND SAID SHE HAD DISCOVERED HER MISTAKE AND APOLOGIZED!
But was that end of it? No. The poster THEN expected an apology from YOU!
And that’s as much as I recall...or wish to remember. Makes me wonder...what’s the difference between an obot and an idiot? Sometimes it’s impossible to tell..
75 posted on Monday, August 02, 2010 8:17:38 PM by Fred Nerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]
“To be a NBC, both parents must be citizens of the US at the time of the person’s birth.”
___________________________________
I do not think there has ever been any question about that.
The question is about the BIRTHPLACE of each parent.
The Obots claim that the birthplace of the parent is
irrelevant, as long as the parents are US citizens.
This is the ONLY point where I would like clarification.
and secondly...did he state born in country was the sole condition required for what he was describing?
Yeah...you wouldn’t want to read any further and find out how that discussion ended up. You might find out there was no forgery.
If you have read your own link, then you know it addresses representative eligibility not presidential eligibility. It is typical of obots to try and misuse a quote, expecting that folks will not go to the link and read. You’re purposely deceiving readers. Why?
Read the link your partner posted, obot. It does not address presidential eligibility. You’ve outed yourself, n00b.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.