I disagree. I thought he asked good, hard questions.
Michelle Bachmann, you once said a woman should submit to her husband, if you were President how would you BLAH BLAH BLAH?
Candidate 2: “25 years ago you promised ______ but in 1990_____. How can we trust you?
No substance in the questions. They were questions designed to try to get good soundbites to promote their programs. Not to inform the American voter.
I thought he was fine as well. The point of the primary and these debates is to vet these candidates. If anyone thinks Wallace is unfair or tough, wait till our eventual nominee is questioned by the MSM in the presidential debates - it'll get much worse.
So let Wallace ask the tough, and perhaps sometimes confrontational, questions now and see how our candidates respond. Let them deal with adversity and see how they handle with it.