[teg_76]

Ugh...who really cares? I’m a Christian, but if a Buddhist believed in traditional values, smaller government and freedom of religion I’d vote for them.

Is this really necessary?

And no I’m not a Romney supporter.

[MacMattico]

I don't like bringing it up either but Obama supporters will and if you have evangelicals sitting at home not voting, you've lost an election. I would vote for Romney over Obama personally, but you will have Obama surrogates calling LDS a cult from coast to coast.

[reaganaut]

Yes it is necessary. I want a president with whom I can agree in prayer. Santorum I can, Perry I can, Gingrich I can, Bachmann I can...

ROMNEY I CANNOT. He worships a different god, I speak from experience (see tagline).

[svcw]

As a Christian you should care.

[MayflowerMadam]

“I’m a Christian, but if a Buddhist believed in traditional values, smaller government and freedom of religion I’d vote for them.”

I’m with you 100% on that. The strictest (is that a word?) Constitutionalist is what’s important. Religion should not be a factor. This was the firm belief of the leader of the Baptists in Virginia while the Constitution was being written, John Leland. It would be nice if the President were a born-again Christian (in my opinion), but it’s most important that the President stands firm on all the freedoms outlined in the Constitution.