That was my impression as well. Frankly I’m puzzled by the pungent vitriol that beck, coulter, krauthammer, hume, etc are showing. These are allegedly pundits who would ordinarily call for us to rally around our candidate once he is selected but how can we do that when they have so effectively poisoned the well?
Assholes all of them.
Hume is especially disgusting. At leat Ann was always a grenade thrower. But Hume has always been measured until now.
The worst part isn’t that Hume doesn’t like Newt - which is clearly the case. It’s that he can’t be objective enough to say ANYTHING positive about him or give him credit for anything, either in the campaign or in his past. Every Myth setback is a tactical error. Every Newt gain is an accident or destined-to-be-fleeting.
We all know there’s plenty to criticize about Newt. But any reasonable person can also see that for conservatives at least, there’s also lots to like. Hume sees none of it, and I’ve never heard him say a positive word about Newt.
Between him, Kraut, Coulter...you really wonder what’s going on.
Hank
Krauthammer just seems to be in the 'Newt can't get elected camp' but the others seem to have a personal animosity against Newt.
I wonder what it is?