Go, Ah say go away, boy, you bother me!
Posted on 02/19/2012 3:57:01 AM PST by Chance Hart
Learn HTML or don’t post.
This may help...
@Key Dates and Landmarks in United States Immigration History
So now explain how this is relevant to the Obama eligibility issue. We know the law had changed before he was born.
There is no evidence at all that his mother lost her citizenship even though it is very clear to the government was very aware she had married two foreign nationals and had left America to live.with one.
I’ve enjoyed the history lesson though - it was an interesting diversion.
Who said all states said the same. My only point is referencing clause 4 vice 5 resides in the legal code of at least two states and therefore it did not indicate shoddy scholarship on the part of the Ankeny judge.
How about addressing this...
Two examples is hardly evidence that all States have the same thing. And you have shown nothing as to why there is even such a discrepancy besides conjecture.
Show me the why and where and then you'll have a leg to stand on.
Here is our law in Texas... @ELECTION CODE TITLE 11. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
SUBCHAPTER B. PRESIDENTIAL AND VICE-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES
Sec. 192.031. PARTY CANDIDATE'S ENTITLEMENT TO PLACE ON BALLOT.
(a) A political party is entitled to have the names of its nominees for president and vice-president of the United States placed on the ballot in a presidential general election if:
No "renumbering" required.
Where, and how, does Indiana have, or get, the authority to "renumber" a clause of the Constitution?
The Indiana Code refers to the amended Constitution. A clause was removed from that section.
@The following text is a transcription of the Constitution in its original form.
Items that are hyperlinked have since been amended or superseded. (emphasis in the original)
Note: A portion of Article II, section 1 of the Constitution was superseded by the 12th amendment.
*Superseded by section 3 of the 20th amendment.
So the rest of Clause 3, that which wasn't superseded, still applies and the clause numbers are still the same.
Remind me.again why this is important. That’s right - it’s not.
The Indiana code says what it says. NH says the same. I am sure there are more if I cared to look further. But I don’t.
It doesn’t help your cause in the slightest.
A clause was removed from that section.
Some might even call your statement an outright lie!
You aren't even man enough to admit that you were wrong.
Oh that’s right - this completely undermines Ankeny and paves the way for frogmarching Obama to prison. Does that sum it up?
Every Republican candidate in NH certified he was a NBC in accordance with Clause 4 - they have been doing it for how many decades now? Do you think that is a legally binding certification?
You can always stop replying to me. Just stop typing if you don’t want any more replies from me. Takes a little self disipline but it works.
Learn HTML or don’t post.
Yeah BM - I will get right on that while your MOMMY fixes your Mac and Cheese dinner! Don’t forget to Boot-Up before you break out that new bar of Ivory Smooooooooooth.
Oh please. It's been so beat to death here on FR that most of the people trying to correct birther silliness have grown tired of it.
The Indiana code says what it says. NH says the same.
Indiana gave us Ankeny. New Hampshire allowed Obama on the ballot.
What are the odds of that?
Must be a deep cover conspiracy going back at least a hundred years. I would start looking at his great-great-great grandparents. This is deeper then you have ever imagined!!!
BTW - didn’t every state let Obama on their ballot?
Do you think those NH declarations were legally binding?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.