Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: pgkdan

Who was willing to do what she was unwilling to do?

The vet said pay ($X) and have a 20% chance of recovery, or pay ($0), and the dog will be put down.

She was unwilling to pay ($X). The dog survived.

So who paid ($X)? Nobody.

The vet gave her dog to “Second Chances”. The dog lived, despite not paying ($X), and the vet then gave her dog away.

Note that the woman was charged for cremation fees.

The vet is scum. The dog obviously did not need ($X) to have a chance to survive, since it survived with ($0) paid. Also, the family was charged for the euthenasia and cremation of their pet.

What did it cost the vet? A bed for the night, $2 for food and water, a phone call to “Second Chances”, and printer ink and paper to print up a phony bill for services not rendered to a family in grief over having to put their family pet down.


16 posted on 02/21/2012 1:58:25 PM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
So who paid ($X)? Nobody.

According to the news article, the rescuers ("Second Chance") paid around $1800 to nurse the dog back to health. Surely some of that was paid to the vet, and likely most of it.

30 posted on 02/21/2012 2:18:47 PM PST by Lady Lucky ( Exposure to the Son may prevent burning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson