Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: red flanker; antonius; writer33; cripplecreek; American Constitutionalist; Mountain Mary; ...

WOW

Hard to imagine a website that is totally in the tank for Romney leading with an article about Newt rising.

OH YEAH, THERE’S NO AGENDA HERE /sarc

Let’s see, raise the conservative far back in the pack up and try to split the conservative base. It would not surprise me to see positive Santorum stories floating on Drudge as well.

Divide and conquer, it’s the name of the game.

Unfortunately, most people won’t be able to see through what’s going on.

Oh well, what do I know?


9 posted on 02/29/2012 7:32:21 PM PST by parksstp (I pick RIck! (If he's good enough for Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh, he's good enough for me))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: parksstp

I`m with you...Sarah Palin 2012 or bust :)


17 posted on 02/29/2012 7:39:53 PM PST by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2012 OR FLIPPIN BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: parksstp
"OH YEAH, THERE’S NO AGENDA HERE /sarc"

Drudge is dumb enough to think this is helping the cause of Romeny, and ultimately the cause of Obama.

But he's wrong.

He's accidentally on the leading edge of the 3rd rise of Gingrich.

When he wakes up he'll go back to his own self.

27 posted on 02/29/2012 7:52:54 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: parksstp; Mariner; Cicero

I don’t think Drudge is doing this for Romney- Romney wants Newt out- he just doubled his PAC advertisement against Newt in Georgia; that will only help Rick, since Romney isn’t even going to campaign in Ga—

http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-politics-elections/pro-romney-super-pac-1367708.html

My bet, Drudge, Coulter, Rush (others) have lost some degree of their “market” based on their conduct this primary season aligning themselves with the GOP-e. -


44 posted on 02/29/2012 8:15:24 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: parksstp

I hope this is an honest move upwards for Newt. And I hope he’s able to take some of Romney’s voters from him.

But I’m afraid you’re right. Even though Romney flooded the market with trash, it did not stick to Santorum well enough to give him a comfortable winning margin. Neither Newt’s nor Santorum’s voters want to vote for Romney. But some will vote for each other’s candidate. So Romney figures the way to defeat the enemy is to split them down the middle. If Newt gets too high, Rombots know they can dump enough trash to keep him under control. So they boost Newt’s standing in order to peel off some of Santorum’s voters when he gets too high up in the polls.

I can just see his manipulative minions planning this. The way to defeat it is for Newt and Santorum to split up the delegate map and work together. But I don’t think that is going to happen. At least I’m sure Mitt is counting on it not happening.


56 posted on 02/29/2012 8:33:22 PM PST by Waryone (Mitt Romney, dangerous homosexualist and lying socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: parksstp

Most people who moved their support to Rick couldn’t see through Obama’s strategy to deliberately make contraception an issue in order to make Rick rise in the polls. We’re in this vote-splitting mess now because people fell for Obama’s smoke and mirrors and abandoned the ONLY conservative who can defeat Romney, Newt Gingrich. The ONLY chance we have now is for people to move back to Newt QUICKLY and make Santorum the afterthought he was before.


67 posted on 02/29/2012 8:56:42 PM PST by JediJones (Watch "Gingrich to Michigan: Change or Die" on YouTube. Best Speech Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: parksstp
The strategy for us from this point on is as follows: If Newt is the strongest conservative in your state, vote for him. If Santorum is the strongest, vote for him.

Either one of them is superior to Romney, but we need to unite NOW if we want to deny liberal Mitt the nomination and, by default, hand Obama another four years.
77 posted on 02/29/2012 9:21:37 PM PST by Antoninus (Mitt Romney -- attempting to execute a hostile take-over of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson