Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: The_Media_never_lie

The officer was the one to *volunteer* putting the animal out of his misery.

The officer than chose to not do so in a more humane manner.

The victim was the animal, not the officer.

A person who thinks it is better to beat an animal to death rather than deal with *paperwork* is not someone who makes good, conservative judgments.


10 posted on 03/14/2012 10:07:28 PM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Altariel

I would say there’s nothing inherently “cruel” about using a club to dispatch a small animal. One good solid crack on the skull and death should be pretty much instantaneous. We don’t know here, and won’t know, upon which strike the cat died. Could be it was dead on on the first blow. Why the excessive number of hits? I have no idea. That’s worth finding out.

But the mere fact that the officer used his PR-24 or an ASP baton to kill a cat is in no way “cruel”, all by itself.


15 posted on 03/14/2012 10:32:48 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

Several years ago, a cop “put a squirrel out of misery with a bullet”...ricochet killed a five year old child.


37 posted on 03/15/2012 6:32:18 AM PDT by beefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson