Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/15/2012 11:24:34 AM PDT by american_steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: american_steve

The libs had no qualms about trying to get the FCC to remove Rush from the airwaves for excersizing his 1st Amendment right.


2 posted on 03/15/2012 11:26:59 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american_steve

It is one thing to tell everyone that you’re some awesome Green Beret with 11 Purple Hearts and 3 Medal of Honors.

I would consider that free speech.

But It is a completely different animal to dress up in uniform with your fake medals and parade around as if you served. That should be punishable.


3 posted on 03/15/2012 11:32:21 AM PDT by And2TheRepublic (People like freedom of speech, but only when it's sweet to their ears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american_steve
Lying is not, nor ever has been protected speech; if it were, every law criminalizing fraud and perjury would be rendered unconstitutional.
4 posted on 03/15/2012 11:35:02 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american_steve

Hmmmm, true enough.

No one should take offense when a liberal pretends to be someone with cojones and lies about it.

Obviously, then, Rush, I, and countless others can correctly term Ms Fluke as a slut?

That’s S L U T

After all, it’s the truth.


6 posted on 03/15/2012 11:43:47 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american_steve

The appropriate punishment should be ongoing public ridicule and shunning, and for the crap to beaten out of him on just one occasion.


8 posted on 03/15/2012 11:48:05 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american_steve

Misrepresentation of your military background is certainly a form of fraud. Any sort of personal gain or political advantage gained by fraud is illegal. If lawyers had not made a mishmash of the legal system, this would be simple.

Instead, progressives want to apply some imaginary prohibition against hate speech to any and all who disagree with them.

Something “funny” is going on here.


9 posted on 03/15/2012 11:48:25 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american_steve

We don’t need laws when simple public shaming will do just fine.


10 posted on 03/15/2012 11:51:21 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american_steve

“Why yes, ma’am, I am a Medical Doctor, please go ahead and disrobe and let me examine you”.

“Hello, this is SENATOR Hodar, can I get a complimentry meal?”

“What do you mean that I’ve committed perjury; I have a right to lie when it suits me”.

Funny that only lawyers and Congressmen would defend the “right” to lie; whereas most people would condemn it.


14 posted on 03/15/2012 11:55:00 AM PDT by Hodar ( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american_steve
the First Amendment forbids laws banning speech that challenges or impugns the government’s reputation.

But this flies in the face of the "It's Now Illegal To Protest Obama" Act just passed by CONgress and signed by the Kenyan.

16 posted on 03/15/2012 11:59:52 AM PDT by Old Sarge (RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american_steve
For some reason the current generation has incarcerated 5 times as many people (per capita) as any other generation in history and is continuing down the path with this law.

We are truly a strange generation.
18 posted on 03/15/2012 12:04:38 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american_steve
Hmmm...not so sure about the unconstitutionality. Can you impersonate an FBI agent? I understand it is in SOME ways different, but we are speaking in both cases of people in Federal employ.

I knew a guy in Chicago who passed himself off as a Viet Vet, and actually did a lot of passionate work on veterans’ behalf and then it turned out he had never served at all.

Are people's lives so miserable that they glom on to veterans status because they otherwise think of themselves as unacceptable human beings?

I don't get this. In my state, you can get a “Vietnam veteran” plate if you were in the service during those years, even if you were never in-country. I intentionally got the “honorably discharged vet” instead, because I thought it presumptuous to put “Viet vet” on my plate when the closest I got to Vietnam in those years was Texas.

32 posted on 03/15/2012 5:59:32 PM PDT by cookcounty (Newt 2012: ---> Because he got it DONE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american_steve

One thing is that it’s becoming very easy to check claims. If you walk into a bar claiming to be a Medal of Honor winner, someone can pull out a smart phone and figure out if you are telling the truth in about three minutes.

One guy told me how he won a major award in the Grenada operation. It took me about five minutes after I got home to find out he was full of it.


35 posted on 03/16/2012 4:39:59 AM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson