[libstripper]

According to Savage, a foreign company now owns the vote-counting operation. All results are sent to their central server. There is no way to audit the count once the results are sent. As we learned from the Wisconsin Supreme Court election back in January (??) there are formal and informal vote counts. In that case AP got early results and called the DemonRat the winner. When the official count came out it turned out one county had been missed and the pubbie won. I suspect, without knowing for sure, that the outfit Savage is talking about is there to do an informal count based on the states' official counts. That could be a source of massive confusion, but not necessarily massive fraud. I want to know a lot more about the actual procedures before I accept what Savage said at face value.

[knarf]

There is only ONE way to stop this insanity and evil .....

ozero MUST be found ineligable and/or illegal

[tired&retired]

“I want to know a lot more about the actual procedures before I accept what Savage said at face value.”

Ditto here.