[[They stipulated that the Court was unable to rely upon the veracity of the electronic BC image, so that they wouldn’t have to withstand scrutiny of the image by an expert witness.]]
so if I’m understasnding you right- the court discussion whent somethign liek so?
Lawyer: Judge, since you the court can’t verify the authenticity of the electronic photo of the BC, then there’s no need to put hte evidence efore experts who might coudl teell it’s a fake, right?
Judge: Good point- Nope- there’ll be no expert scrutiny to see if the obama administration faked the BC
Does that abuot sum it up?
IF the BC was ligit, Why did the lawyer weasel her way around the law by arguing such assinine arguments? (which fortunately for her, the judge bought hook line and sinker for fear of losing his job apparently)
By my lights, more like this:
Lawyer: “We want to call an expert witness to impeach the image of the birth certificate as forged.”
Opposing Counsel: “We object to the expert witness.”
Lawyer: “Okay, maybe we don’t need an expert witness to impeach the image, if you will stipulate that the Court cannot rely on the image as evidence.”
Opposing Counsel: “Yes, we will so stipulate, but we don’t need to show no steenking birth certificate anyway.”