[[The fact that the lawyer went to great lengths to avoid having this alleged document scrutinized in court is indeed a tacit admission that is legally insufficient.]]
I fully agree with you- however your last statement is an assumption, not a fact that would hold up in court I don’t beleive- I agree the lawyer wentto great lengths to avoid havign hte document scrutinized- and htere almost certainly was a definate reason why she did- however provign why is what the right would have to prove ion court to get a conviction- or whetever-
The Judge shoudl have demanded that hte defense GET the original birth cirtificate and present it to him imediately! instead, thsi judge was apaprently too afraid of losing their job and didn’t require the actual document in question be presented for expert scrutiny-
Antoher travfesty of justice because noone dares stand up against a media supported black man in office-
It strikes me that the point of this legal dance was to avoid having that document (fake b.c.) entered into evidence. It’s one thing to post it on the internet. It’s another to offer it as a legal document in a court proceeding. That opens up a whole can of worms. So - again - I really think it’s just about NOT GIVING IT TO A COURT OF LAW.
Read into that what you will, but I think that’s all it is. Just another sleazy tactic, delaying tactic by the Occupier-in-Chief