Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officer shoots man's dog after 911 Caller Gives Wrong Address
MSNBC ^ | 4/21/2012 | Miranda Leitsinger

Posted on 04/21/2012 3:09:35 PM PDT by nickcarraway

A man whose Australian Cattle Dog Cisco was shot dead by a Texas police officer responding to a 911 call at a wrong address is asking for improvements to how authorities handle animals they encounter during such investigations.

Michael Paxton said he was playing with his 7-year-old dog in his backyard in Austin on a “quiet” Saturday when an officer showed up in his driveway. His dog, who ran out barking, was dead in seconds, he said. “I told the officer, you know, don’t shoot my dog cause I knew the dog was going to run forward towards us,” Paxton, a 40-year-old lab tech, told msnbc.com. “He (Cisco) ran to the officer’s feet; the officer shot him and killed him.” Advertise | AdChoices

“I was panicked, traumatized,” he said, noting that Cisco -- who he said has never attacked anyone -- was like his child. “It’s a very painful loss for me.”

The policeman had been responding to a call about a man holding a woman against her will and fighting out front at the address, Sgt. David Daniels, a police spokesman, told msnbc.com. But the pair didn’t live there and were not on the scene when the officer arrived, he said. That was not known when the officer reached Paxton’s home, Daniels said, adding that police did eventually find the pair, who lived a few doors down.

“It’s unfortunate that these two particular individuals were fighting in front ... of that location, but that was the location that was provided to the officer,” he said. From a recording made at the scene, and played on a local affiliate, the officer can be heard yelling, “Show me your hands! Show me your hands! Hey, get your dog!” and then a shot is heard.

(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Local News; Miscellaneous; Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/21/2012 3:09:41 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I await the police apologists.

There was a time when risk was associated with the job. At some point, lethal force was allowed to eliminate that risk.

I'd love to hear from some FReeper cops who think that a border collie poses such a risk that it must be put down.
2 posted on 04/21/2012 3:14:30 PM PDT by andyk (Go Juan Pablo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Presidential dinner?

ML/NJ

3 posted on 04/21/2012 3:15:50 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

This is happening waaaay too much lately it seems. I hope the guy sues.


4 posted on 04/21/2012 3:18:21 PM PDT by howlinhound (Live your life so that, when you get up in the morning, Satan says, "Oh Crap!..He's awake" - Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The police officer was trespassing and it sounds like he was also quite full of himself. "Show me your hands!" he yelled at the homeowner minding his own business on his own property. Never mind that the officer saw no activity that resembled the disturbance described on the call. He just showed up and started yelling at whomever he saw. "Get off my land, Barney!" would have been an appropriate reply.

This police business is getting way out of hand. There are too many laws and too many cops, and our freedom is being strangled to death.

5 posted on 04/21/2012 3:22:26 PM PDT by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: howlinhound
This is happening waaaay too much lately it seems.

Well that's what I wonder. Is it really that much more prevalent, which I believe, based on the mililtarization of our police, or is the news just more pervasive?
6 posted on 04/21/2012 3:22:26 PM PDT by andyk (Go Juan Pablo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Any fracking storm trooper shoots my dog and he’s going to pay, one way or another, sooner or later, he’s going to pay.


7 posted on 04/21/2012 3:23:08 PM PDT by MtBaldy (If Obama is the answer, it must have been a really stupid question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andyk

Cops develop a very jaded cynical view of their fellow citizens. They believe everyone is bad and breaking the law somehow. Their attitude when they bust, or bust a cap in, the wrong guy is, “He may have been innocent this time but I know he’s dirty”. The first time I saw a SWAT team with their identity’s completely shielded I didn’t want to believe it was happening in America. Cops don’t help themselves either when they band together and close ranks to protect one of their own that was clearly in the wrong, and it happens a lot. At one time I respected and trusted most cops, now I consider any of them as potential enemies.


8 posted on 04/21/2012 3:43:03 PM PDT by MtBaldy (If Obama is the answer, it must have been a really stupid question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Any challenge to an Obama employee’s authority is a potential two week vacation with pay. Those 50,000,000 pistol rounds are gathering dust.


9 posted on 04/21/2012 3:46:13 PM PDT by AnTiw1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The only way to stop this BS is to make the police change their policies. You know, from the sheer preponderance of articles about cops shooting dogs for virtually nothing, that police policies must call for killing any dog in the area regardless.

A new policy in police departments should be no dog is shot until he actually has his teeth in the officer's leg. That would stop this BS in it's tracks. When cops shoot a human there must be evidence that an attack either occurred or was about to, such as the perp having a gun or knife or firing shots or physically attacking the officer, etc. When they shoot a dog all they have to do is claim the dog attack with no proof required.

10 posted on 04/21/2012 4:01:49 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Wow, I can easily imagine an officer being shot for that kind of behavior. I mean, if a person were there witnessing those events transpire, and the officer was behaving that erratically--drawing his weapon while making inconsistent demands and then immediately discharging that weapon to kill a small dog--it's not inconceivable they might honestly fear the officer would then turn and fire on the innocent dog owner. It's indefensibly bizarre conduct. That officer should be fired or reassigned to some kind of unarmed duty, maybe the DMV, before he gets himself or someone else killed. That's the problem with cities hiring armed goon squads these days. They may be "our" goons (maybe), but at the end of the day they're still goons. Blunt instruments, if you will. I guess police militarism is finally winning out over professionalism. When I was a kid you knew and looked up to the local cops, maybe aspired to be one. You sure as hell didn't have to look at them and wonder when the next one was going to go off.
11 posted on 04/21/2012 4:11:35 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Does the officer have a family dog? How would he take to a fireman responding to the wrong house axing it?


12 posted on 04/21/2012 4:12:33 PM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
“It’s unfortunate that these two particular individuals were fighting in front ... of that location, but that was the location that was provided to the officer,” he said

What a horrible sentiment. Hands up! Get your dog! Wait, hands up!

The implication is that dogs are fair game when police are called. Well, it was the address given over the phone, after all.
13 posted on 04/21/2012 4:16:12 PM PDT by andyk (Go Juan Pablo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Clearly not a man who ought to be a police officer, a coward.


14 posted on 04/21/2012 5:09:09 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!-Sam Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

A “shoot first, ask questions later” mentality is not what we want people we authorized to use deadly force to have.

Observing no unusual activity the policeman should have exercised better judgement and investigated before pulling his weapon. He was called to cool down a situation not escalate the potential for violence and mayhem. Clearly this is a man that is not up to the challenges of his profession.

Australian Cattle Dogs are small dogs that don’t pose a threat other than as a ankle nipper. They are however fearless and determined which serves them well herding cattle and sheep.


15 posted on 04/23/2012 3:21:34 AM PDT by Outrance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson