Skip to comments.
Are the Koch billionaire brothers paying for Zimmerman's defense? (Here it comes!)
AllVoices ^
| May 5, 2012
| Veronica Roberts
Posted on 05/05/2012 11:30:57 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"twenty-five cents per 1,000 pageviews.." See what you have done? You have probably increased this puke's income by $0.0025 by posting this here!
To: expat1000
Well, seeing as the writer has not reached grade 6 proficiency in grammar (bare arms) I wouldnt give it much credibility.The writer wants people to "ban" (band?) together, too. Spell check, no proofreader.
22
posted on
05/06/2012 1:07:35 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
To: ThunderSleeps
In that situtation if you're in Zimmerman's position and you're not in fear for your life you are a fool. If you have the ability to defend yourself with deadly force and choose not to use it, you deserve to die, period. Cold, harsh, yes. Guess what, that's the way of the world. Martin attacked Zimmerman with deadly force. Zimmerman was not only justified in responding with deadly force, I contend he was morally obligated to remove that evil threat from society.I think you're a little off track. Z had the gun on his person, but he was under severe duress, and according to some accunts I've read, he stated he even forgot he had it. It was when M noticed it that the gun became the focal point of their struggle. I guess at that point one or the other of them was going to be shot. Here it's a matter of a split second. I have to suppose that the disposition of the weapon was favorable to Z, and he reacted fast enough to turn the event his way.
23
posted on
05/06/2012 1:11:42 AM PDT
by
dr_lew
To: dr_lew; ThunderSleeps
Either way it’s justifiable homicide, no?
24
posted on
05/06/2012 1:27:49 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
To: meatloaf
they feel he had legal right to bare arms. Whats wrong with bare arms? Are they on Zimmermans ass because of a dress code violation?My first impression aside from that childish mistake in homonyms was, "who writes this sort of crap?"
Are all communists illiterate? or is it "are all illiterates communist?"
25
posted on
05/06/2012 1:32:13 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
("It's easy to make promises you can't keep" - B.H.Obama Feb 23, 2012)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
In psychological terms, she is batshit crazy.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I’m a regular user of many of those products, and I’ll feel better knowing that my purchases are benefiting the Koch Bros. when I buy them in the future.
I’d also be happy to know that the Bros. are contributing to the defense of Mr. Zimmerman, because I believe he is not guilty of anything but self defense. I plan to contribute to him as well.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I think leftist idiots have controlled this country long enough. I’ll go out of my way to buy those paper products. And boycott the Left.
28
posted on
05/06/2012 3:46:36 AM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(Socialism isn't going to work this time, either.)
To: expat1000
" (bare arms)"
That's where I stopped.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Is it surprizing that dirty mindless mobs were to reject those products to provide more sanitary conditions?
30
posted on
05/06/2012 3:54:06 AM PDT
by
monocle
To: 2ndDivisionVet
31
posted on
05/06/2012 3:55:48 AM PDT
by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist savages, start today.)
To: TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
I stopped at the "gentile" toilet paper, LOL.
Leni
To: tcrlaf
...”They DARE to counter-finance against DARTH SOROS, and that just cannot be allowed”...
Perfect insight!
33
posted on
05/06/2012 4:06:31 AM PDT
by
jazzlite
(esat)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I am personally paying for his defense. I am Spartacus! The left has nothing and their magic man is an idiot. They will soon find that hole in the ground that keeps them warm.
34
posted on
05/06/2012 4:10:01 AM PDT
by
eyedigress
((zOld storm chaser from the west)/?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“legal right to bare arms... “
Shouldn’t that be: “legal right to arm bears...”?
35
posted on
05/06/2012 4:10:04 AM PDT
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
LOL!
Moochelle has the legal right to bare arms
She exercises that right at virtually every event where she represents the USA
Now, the rest of of us have the right to bear arms
However the US Constitution doesn’t say we can arm bears.
36
posted on
05/06/2012 4:33:19 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Funny how all the people who are for abortion are already born)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Boy these Koch guys are pretty cool.
37
posted on
05/06/2012 4:39:25 AM PDT
by
Vision
("Did I not say to you that if you would believe, you would see the glory of God?" John 11:40)
To: MinuteGal
Emily Latilla: What’s all this I keep hearing about gentile toilet paper? Why, that’s anti-semitic. Don’t Jewish people have the right to use toilet paper, too? [pounds little fist on desk]
Chevy Chase: Miss Latilla, that’s gentle toilet paper. Gentle, not gentile.
Miss Litilla: Oh, well, then. That’s different. [looks into the camera and smiles] Never mind.
38
posted on
05/06/2012 4:55:10 AM PDT
by
alnick
To: silverleaf
39
posted on
05/06/2012 4:55:29 AM PDT
by
eyedigress
((zOld storm chaser from the west)/?)
To: Nacho Bidnith
Koch bought a stuggling paper products company called Georgia-Pacific some years ago. They cleaned it up, removed most do-nothing middle management and slimed down the production payroll. It was a winner in less than 12 months.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson