Why give time of birth but not day of birth? This is crazy. There is only on reason for years they have just not given the complete, accurate info out. After all this time to keep holding stuff back.
Exactly. What Hawaii actually did was confirm the BC Obama posted on the White House website is Forgery!
Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio made a Probable Cause Finding that the birth document posted on the White House Website, by Barack Obama on April 27th, 2011, is a forgery. It’s simply a matter now of finding out who did it and who knew about it.
In response to this finding Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett asked Hawaii to verify the information listed on that birth document. After months of stonewalling Hawaii sent Bennett a ‘Verification of Birth’ on May 22, 2012.
Guess What? Hawaii can not confirm Obama’s birth day or his birth year. The time of birth is verified but the day and year of birth are strangely missing. This means they are NOT verified.
The birth document Obama posted on the White House Website, the one he is using to prove he is qualified to be a presidential candidate, lists the birth day as August 4 and birth year as 1961. Can you imagine being asked to verify if someone was born on August 4, 1961 at 7:24 p.m. and all you can confirm is, “Yes he was born at 7:24 p.m.”.
The “verification” also says it “verifies” that, “A birth certificate is on file with the Department of health indicating that Barack Hussein Obama, II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.” Indicating? Who says “indicating” when they are verifying?
Verify: 1. To confirm or substantiate in law by oath
2. To establish the truth, accuracy or reality of the claim
Does “indicating” sound like verify to you? Parsed words speak volumes.
Bennett also asked Hawaii to, “verify the attached copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama is a true and accurate representation of the original record in your files.” Here, Bennett is asking Hawaii to confirm that the attached document looks identical to the original Hawaii claims they have.
Remember, on April 27, 2011 Obama said that his lawyer, Judith Corley, flew to Hawaii and brought back two photocopies of his original birth certificate and he posted one of them on the White House Website. Bennett had attached a print out of that photocopy. A photocopy would be identical to the original.
Yet Hawaii could not confirm that it matched. They responded, “I verify that the information in the copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama that you attached with your request matches the original record in our files.”
Parsed words speak volumes. The information matches but the document does not.
And if the “information matches” then why did Hawaii confirm the time of Obama’s purported birth but refuse to confirm the day and year of Obama’s birth when Bennett specifically asked them to?
This lack of confirmation verifies that the BC Obama posted on the White House Website is a forgery. A copy of an original BC can not be a “little bit verified”. It is an exact match or it isn’t and Hawaii is telling us it is not a match. Hello! The document posted on the White House Website does not match the birth certificate Hawaii “claims” they have in their file for Barack Hussein Obama II.
Forgery Confirmed.
Is that why the Hawaii Registrar, Alvin T. Onaka, didn’t sign the Verification of Birth? There is a small “gk” next to the registrar’s signature stamp. I don’t think you can legally verify a document by proxy but maybe it would allow you to claim “plausible deniability” when the cow pie hits the fan.