Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JerseyanExile
She showed her age during WWII, too.

Outgunned (14"--360mm/45 cal guns) and outdistanced by later German 15" (38cm SK C/34) and American 16" (460mm/50cal Mark 7) designs.

Lovely lines, though.

57 posted on 06/13/2012 10:04:02 AM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nonsporting
Outgunned (14"--360mm/45 cal guns) and outdistanced by later German 15" (38cm SK C/34) and American 16" (460mm/50cal Mark 7) designs.

Except that there weren't many ship to ship encounters among battleships in WWII. Aircraft carriers made it possible to attack battleships from hundreds of miles while putting orders of magnitude fewer lives at risk. The Japanese battleship Yamato had 18" guns that could out range the Iowa class, but that was irrelevant. It was sunk by carrier based naval planes. The main use for battleships in WWII was shore bombardment for amphibious operations. The triple expansion steam engines on the Texas were obsolete even when it was built, and made it too slow to keep up with carriers. Once WWII was over, there really wasn't any need to keep such an obsolete ship.

62 posted on 06/13/2012 4:45:44 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: nonsporting
Bismark Max Range: 36,520m (22.70 miles)

And the Bismark was fatally wounded by carrier based RAF Swordfish biplanes, and the carriers were well out of range of Bismark's guns.

63 posted on 06/13/2012 4:50:22 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: nonsporting

Texas, her sister New York and the slightly older Arkansas were slated to be decommissioned prior to WWII, with the Washington and South Dakota ships being built. They were retained as convoy escorts and shore bombardment platforms, and were not even considered to be part of the US fleet’s battle line.

The slightly newer Oklahoma wasn’t rebuilt after turning turtle at Pearl Harbor specifically because her tripple expansion engines severely limited her operational capability. The three old “coal burners” were retained because they were still operational and somewhat useful.


71 posted on 06/14/2012 10:35:24 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson