Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Plummz
Absolutely true. The above is a false statement on your part. You would do well to retract along with with your previous false statements.

The film at discussion in this thread posits that Stanley Armour Dunham was working for U.S. Air Force intelligence. Do you have any specific, cogent criticisms of the film on this point? Such would be beneficial to an on-topic discussion rather than your previous insults and spam.

There is also U.S. Army intelligence, the KGB, and MI6 to name a few other possibilities.

The trip to birth the baby outside of Hawaii would have been business, rather than pleasure. This is another faulty assumption in your rant.

Finally, one should note that intelligence agents by nature do not create a high profile. It would be silly to expect an intelligence agent seeking a low profile to live profligately. That would be a very stupid thing to do. Yet another bone-headed assumption in your attempted reasoning.

Done with you too. Have fun playing in your world.


37 posted on 07/03/2012 6:50:45 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

You forgot to retract your false statement.


38 posted on 07/03/2012 9:51:38 AM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson