Females only go where the money is - it’s always been that way.
“said women are subtle when they discover a man is living off his savings.”
In other words, two cannot live as well as she living off your savings.
“You usually get the first date.”
And who usually pays for that?
He has a plan? Yea, right. Stupidity abounds. My wife contends the framers had it right about women voting. Actually, it was perfect in that only property owners got to vote.
And men are less likely to date a woman with a disfiguring skin condition—even if she’s on a treatment with a good chance to clear it up.
What a shock.
I’ve had people (HR types and others responsible for hiring) tell me that don’t hire single men, although they will hire single women.
The 0boz0 regime has an app for that: women have a constitutuional right to date a man with a job, so 0boz0 proposes we employ men at new call centers nationwide where other men can call for information on obtaining employment at a call center. The program is modelled after the Solyndra and food stamp programs.
For women who are looking for husband material and for fathers of their future children, not just a good time or a one night stand, it only makes sense to want to date men who are employed. It is not the “gold digger” mentality that some of you are assuming.
Let's look at it another way. Let's say you have a single daughter in her 20’s or 30’s or older. Who would you prefer she dates? Someone with a job, or someone without one? If you have an unemployed single adult son at any age. What would you advise him to do? Focus on getting a woman or a job? These are no-brainers. (Unless of course you and your daughter or son are expecting to have access to Obama's stash.)
It's only unemployed white middle-class Betas that they have issues with, because the purpose of the Beta is to support a woman while she runs around behind his back with the unemployed gangstas.
I don’t see a whole lot of evidence of employed people having time for dating lately...
An NFL player or NBA player put on waivers will still have a line of women who want to bop him.
Men are better off without such women.
Ladies, a plan doesn't pay the rent.
No one wants to marry “women” these days because even if they do have a job they also have HUGE credit card bills.
Females have two powerful biological imperatives. The first is to find the best potential sperm donor for their offspring. The second is to bond with the best available provider male to help her raise her offspring.
When there are a lot of available males, these two are unlikely to be the same male.
Males have the single biological imperative to produce as many offspring with their DNA, with as many different females, as they can.
However, this is at a basic biological level. Humans innovated monogamous, socially enforced marriage, which offers females, males, and especially their offspring, a much better deal than just basic reproduction.
(They also then innovated a way to ruin the system, called dowry, which defeated the purpose of quality reproduction.)
In any event, these biological imperatives, along with the others, like the female imperative to “display” herself to potential mates, and the male imperative to act like lions gazing at gazelles when females do this, lend themselves to social extremism.
The display thing and the male reaction to it is the fundamental reason for pornography. The male desire to spread around his DNA means that males are often Lotharios. And females will “date” the most hideous males who somehow have “interesting” genetics, and become downright mercenary when looking for a provider male.
The treatment for a lot of these social ills is first and foremost, to socialize children to the opposite gender throughout their maturation, so they see each other with clarity, not as enigmatic alien beings.
Second is to revitalize socially enforced marriage, by discouraging hasty marriage and divorce, and to inhibit those that would violate that marriage.
Third would be to create social alternatives for those who are not intended to be “breeders”. Some of these already exist, such as prostitution, and post-menopausal sexual activity. In many places, lifetime military service for males.
In the past when I was single and between jobs, I’d stop dating until I was employed again. Just didn’t want to have to tell a woman I didn’t have a job and don’t like to BS people.
This has to be the lynch-pin of the demoKKKrat plan to reduce the world’s human population to medieval levels for the glory of Gaea, i.e. the rational for Bork Obunga to want to crash the U.S. economy: no jobs ==> no dates ==> no marriages ==> no children ==> voila, medieval population levels in a mere 50 years...