You doth protest too much. Your dates are off by one year.
First off after the 2001 Sandusky engaged in improper conduct with at least two children in the Lash Building. Those assaults may well have been prevented if Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley had taken additional actions to safequard children on Unicersity facilties.
Second at no time did any of these people inquire into the well being of the child. Paterno never did and I conclude that these people did not care.
In September of that same year Penn State sells a parcel of land to Second Mile and Schultz issues a press release lauding Sandusky.
What do I think Paterno should have done? He should have been a man and called the police and help them try to find the victim.
Sorry -- I copied if from a USA Today article. Unfortunately I am unable to copy segments of the Freeh report -- like the timeline. ww.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/bigten/story/2011-11-10/jerry-sandusky-investigation-victim-1-cover/51160950/1
First off after the 2001 Sandusky engaged in improper conduct with at least two children in the Lash Building. Those assaults may well have been prevented if Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley had taken additional actions to safequard children on Unicersity facilties.
Show me the evidence that Paterno was in the loop with Curley, Schulz, and Spanier, and University Police Chief Harmon, and DA Ray Gricar at any time before the February 2001 McQuery incident???
I don't see it in the report.
I agree with you...
CYA was the name of this Institution...
Nowhere in this decades long episode was there any follow up, ie concern, for the children, By the years in 2000 decade, Sexual child abuse was pretty well known and Paterno surely knew about what the Catholic church was going through...Most high up officials , even middle management DON’T WANT TO KNOW.
Molesting kids was just not a big deal to these guys..but the “image” of the university, the protection of the football team bringing in millions of donations...now THAT was important.