Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: factoryrat; mrsmith; katana

http://64.8.116.193/archive/2011/11/13/formaldehyde-in-baby-shampoo-crunch-the-numbers-crunch-the-scare.aspx

Thanks. Looks like a preservative. But with all the recalls J&J’s had, and an OTC plant in Pennsylvania being so dirty it’s been shut down for years, my ears go back at the mention of J&J.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704823004576192923011606158.html


14 posted on 08/15/2012 9:22:49 AM PDT by To-Whose-Benefit? (It is Error alone which needs the support of Government. The Truth can stand by itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: To-Whose-Benefit?

Excellent! Those were the numbers I was looking for. Thanks again.


15 posted on 08/15/2012 9:30:27 AM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: To-Whose-Benefit?

A formaldehyde releasing agent seems like a terrific preservative- continually releasing small amounts of formaldehyde- for a product that will sit long months in an environment like a bathroom.

I assume they’ve found an equally good preservative for close to the same price.
If not- and someone leaves the top off for a couple months and their baby gets meningitis or the plague- it’s going to be worse for J&J!

I use baby shampoo my old self, the cheapest brands. No need to pay for the cosmetic additives, dangerous or not.


16 posted on 08/15/2012 10:06:23 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson