What a crock! So some reputed leader of an association that “represents” 4,000 “Gentlemen’s Clubs” spouts unverifiable stats and it is accepted as legitimate, no questions asked - including people on this thread. How is the figure of $150 vs. $50 arrived at? Are there polls conducted at the door when a convention arrives in town? If this is so legit then wouldn’t the numbers be something in the odd-numbered realm of $143 vs. $52.
This is just another example by CNN - the second in two days - of trying to paint Republican convention attendees as somehow “dirtier” than their Democrat counterparts with spurious “proof” from questionable sources using supposed stats that the most mathematically-inclined could understand the import.
BTW, "gentlemen's clubs" generally cater to heterosexual men. Betcha the Chippendales gets a lot more democrat male's dollars.
You said what I was about to post, but you said it better. This is pure BS and for CNN to air this just shows why they are doing so well.
It’s easy to tell. The GOP spends their own money.
it may make sense.
republicans spend their OWN money as they see fit.
demorats have no money of their own and have to rely on lapdances from charity organizations....