Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: westcoastwillieg

I downloaded the LFBC from the White House website on the day they released it and used Adobe Illustrator to separate out the layers. I’m no genius and don’t claim that I discovered the technique by any means, but when people began posting the method of using Illustrator to break down the document into it’s component parts I was able to do the test myself and confirm that their assertions were legitimate.

There is absolutely zero chance that the LFBC produced by the white house is a scan of a legitimate document.


3 posted on 09/03/2012 5:58:55 PM PDT by Two Kids' Dad ((((( )))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Two Kids' Dad
99% of the anomalies stem back to the fact that the ORIGINAL was photographed and the negative stored as microfiche for many years.

The microfiche was then digitally scanned and stored.

That digital image was used to print on security paper.

At some point someone scanned the security paper and created a new digital image.

No doubt you can find all sorts of things ~ virtually ever birth certificate in America was subjected to a similar process shortly after the microfiche process was marketed in the 1960s.

4 posted on 09/03/2012 6:14:45 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson