Replies

99% of the anomalies stem back to the fact that the ORIGINAL was photographed and the negative stored as microfiche for many years.
___________________________________________________

So, explain why the Nordyke twins certified BC copy is in what we all expect and recognize as the conventional reverse microfiche format? They were born extremely close in time to the alleged birth of Obama. I’m waiting - - -

Did anyone ever give any sort of explanation for the penciled-in number 9’s that are in two of the spaces? I read that a retired worker said that those were a code that indicated the spaces were left blank, but in the released long form birth certificate they were, in fact, filled in. This was evidence of fraud. I haven’t found O-bots address this.

You missed those half dozen threads where the Nordyke BCs were dissected and discussed at length and apparent anomalies in the Obamugabe BC were matched against the same, or variations of the same anomalies in the Nordyke ~ copies as I recall ~ obtained BEFORE the age of fiche and/or modern microfilm.

Again, what you see coming from Obamugabe or his running dog lackeys (in terms of the so-called LF BC) is derived from a modern digital dataset that shows what was in the microfiche, which in turn shows you what was in the original page/book created way back when (late 1960s at the earliest)

Then there's this thought ~ certainly with access to the full array of talented forgers and criminals at the KGB, Obamugabe's forged LF BC has to be PERFECTLY in tune with all the others in that file!

The Nordyke BCs were printed from photostatic copy, not from fiche. To make fiche most of your big vendors and file management companies went to the original documents and re-filmed them.

When you used high quality B&W document quality film you didn't have a pixalated matrix ~ rather, you had a random array of microdots.

Once technology allowed us to go to electronic image storage and retrieval, the original documents might have been scanned or re-imaged in a pixalated matrix, and if they weren't available they'd scan the fiche.

You could do a xerox copy of an original document and have a digital print made of the pixalated original stored in electronic compatible media, then overlay them, and probably not immediately see the difference. That's because both systems can yield copy perfectly acceptable to human vision. However, if you magnified the image at some point you'd see the matrix, and see the pixals, and they'd be different (presuming you used equipment made by different companies).

Now, scan that ~ it'll show anomalies that were otherwise invisible to you. They are called ARTIFACTS OF THE PROCESS