Actually Protestants voted against Roosevelt in 1940 and 1944, and against Truman in 1948, against the dems in 1952, and 1956, and against JFK in 1960.
Three times they voted democrat, against all but six times for Catholics, and you think the anti-democrat voters are the problem?
If America voted like it’s original Protestant people, then we wouldn’t be in this situation, Catholics on the other hand almost always support the democrats, and while the Catholic percentage of the population won’t grow, the Catholic vote will be moving even farther left than it is today.
I was right though, you want America ended and replaced as a European, Catholic nation, closer to what you came from.
That has been the Catholic influence since they started immigrating here.
As I pointed out a few times, “Protestants voted Republican” or “Catholics voted Democrat” are meaningless propositions. Enough Protestants voted for the New Deal, and for the Great Society to outweigh the Catholics however it was that they voted, and yes, the immigrant vote tends to be Catholic and very bad for the country. I am very happy when the Protestants vote Protestant, but the problem is, they don’t seem to know how to win. Besides, again, as I pointed out before, America so far has been a Protestant project. If, for example, there is an engineer and he had built a plane that crashed on the ground, it happened not because the engineer wanted for the plane to crash or “voted” for it to crash; it is because his design did not prevent the plane from crashing. Again, if this thought is difficult to understand, — and since you keep repeating the statistical points it is a difficulty for you, — I will gladly explain again.
Also, your conjectures of what I am or want for America are factually false; however, quite regardless of what I am like personally (if it helps to clarify your thinking imagine you are talking to a Vatican’s secret agent and be done with my persona), would you please make a coherent comment that is not about past statistics which I never disputed, or about the harmfulness of immigration which I never disputed either?