Replies

>"I want to disagree and I can not believe that US service men would fire on everyday American Civilians exercising their constitutional rights, "

Waco.

Waco was strictly federal law enforcement agencies - not military. They just looked like military because of their armored vehicles and stormtrooper attire. I have almost no faith in law enforcement at any level, because they are too used to being the enforcement arm for the State, but I do have faith in most of our military doing the right thing when the time comes.

“Waco was strictly federal law enforcement agencies - not military.”

The feds got assistance from the military in violation of “posse comitatus”.

They trumped up a drug charge to get around posse comitatus.

The previous residents had some kind of drug lab, but the Davidians dismantled the equipment. Drugs were not an issue at Waco.

The NRA wanted to X-ray the supposed illegally converted rifles to see if the conversion was done before or after the fire, and they were not allowed access to them.

H.R. 675: Building Obama’s Civilian National Security Force
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
June 23, 2009

In January, without any recognizable corporate media coverage, Rep. Bob Filner, a California Democrat, introduced H.R. 675. The bill would amend title 10 of the United States Code and extend to civilian employees of the Department of Defense the authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms. The bill was referred to the Armed Services Committee on January 26, 2009.

Rep. Bob Filner

Filner’s bill would amend the United States code with the following: “Sec. 1585b. Law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense: authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms… for any offense against the United States.” (Emphasis added.) ...

...

HR 675 reintroduced, now HR 324 -01/2011

If you haven't seen, Rep Filner has reintroduced his resolution. It is now HR 324 with some minor changes.

I know not everyone is going to be happy with it but it is what it is and is better than nothing. I know the guy who did the leg work to meet with Filner and he did it for everyone.

If you are a 0083, you need to get behind it and lobby your reps to support it. It is easy to complain but who is willing to step up? I am gonna be in DC next month for the AFGE Legislative Conference and already have meetings with my reps to lobby for their support. ...

STANDARDS

Police Series, 0083

Associated Group Standard

There is no Group Coverage Qualification Standard for this series. Use the Individual Occupational Requirements described below. -OPM